Saturday, 6 May 2017

New details on Aaron Hernandez's apparent suicide in prison


By Eric Levenson and Evan Simko-Bednarski, CNN

(CNN)Before Aaron Hernandez hanged himself, he stuffed cardboard in the tracks of his cell door, making it difficult for prison officers to enter and render aid.
That was not a new tactic for Hernandez. He had twice previously been disciplined for tampering with the door and covering its entrance, according to a review of his disciplinary records at Souza-Baranowski Correctional Facility.
    In addition, Hernandez did not have drugs in his system when he was found naked hanging from a bedsheet in his prison cell, according to a death investigation from Massachusetts State Police and the Worcester County district attorney.
    Correction officers found Hernandez amid a gruesome scene, with drawings on the wall and "John 3:16" markings written in a substance consistent with blood, the investigation found.
    The two reports, released to CNN in public records requests on Thursday afternoon, provide further details into the former NFL star's apparent suicide in prison in the early morning hours on April 19.
    Jose Baez, Hernandez's attorney, said in a statement that the leaks of this information to the media cast doubt on the integrity of the investigation.
    "The unprofessional behavior of those entrusted to impartially and professionally conduct an investigation into Aaron's death has caused grave concern as to the validity and thoroughness of the investigation," he said.
    "Accordingly, we intend to fully, completely and impartially review all of the evidence in this matter."
    Hernandez had been serving a sentence of life in prison for the June 2013 murder of Odin Lloyd. Hernandez's death came just days after he was acquitted of two murder charges related to a July 2012 drive-by shooting outside a Boston nightclub.
    Cell had been blocked before

    Hernandez was found dead at 3 a.m. when a correction officer noticed a sheet hanging in front of Hernandez's cell door and asked that he remove it or sound off, according to the report.
    The officer poked at the sheet and it fell, revealing Hernandez hanged from a sheet tied to the window bars. Hernandez had "pegged" the door to his cell by stuffing its tracks with cardboard, making entry difficult, the report states.
    He had obscured officers' view of his cell before. The prison disciplinary records detail an incident shortly after Hernandez was convicted of murdering Lloyd.
    On May 17, 2015, a guard visited Hernandez's cell to check for marks and bruising following an alleged altercation.
    "I ask for the cell door to open, but the inmate had the door blocked, making it difficult to open at first," according to a report of the offense.
    He was accused of tampering with a locking device, and was disciplined with loss of 60 units from his canteen.
    Two months later, a guard doing a cell check found a curtain hanging from the top bunk of Hernandez's cell. A curtain was also hung across the doorway, obstructing the view into the cell, records show.
    Hernandez pleaded guilty to the offense and was docked 15 units from his canteen as discipline.

    Blood drawings on wall

    The night of his death, Hernandez had placed a large amount of shampoo on the floor to his cell, making it very slippery, according to the investigation report. Ligature marks were visible on his neck, and there was discharge and vomit coming from his nose and mouth areas, the report states.
    The report also says that Hernandez's right middle finger had a "fresh" cut and that there was blood on his other fingers. In addition, there was a large circular blood mark on each of his feet and "John 3:16" was written on his forehead in ink.
    No other signs of trauma were found on his body, and there were no signs of a struggle, the report states.
    Underneath the drawings on the wall was a Bible open to John 3:16, with the 16th verse marked in blood, according to the report. Three handwritten notes, the text of which are redacted in the report, were also found next to the Bible.
    John 3:16 is a reference to the well-known Biblical verse, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life."

    1 a.m. cell check

    Hernandez had been locked in his cell at 8:00 p.m. the evening before his death. At 1:00 a.m., a correction officer saw him during a cell check.
    Surveillance video shows that no one entered or left his cell from 8:00 p.m. until he was discovered just after 3:00 a.m., according to the report.
    Video also shows Hernandez had just gotten off the phone prior to being locked in the cell. The previous five phone calls he made that day did not give any apparent indication that he planned to harm himself, according to the report.
    A postmortem toxicology test came back negative for all substances, including synthetic cannabinoids.

    SOURCE: edition.cnn.com

    Trump’s executive order disappoints religious conservatives



    WASHINGTON — An executive order by President Trump meant to reward religious conservatives for their support of him in last year’s election fell short of what many had hoped for and drew widespread criticism on Thursday.

    “The executive order on the whole looks to accomplish very little of substance, against the backdrop of a lot of show,” said John Inazu, a professor of law and religion at Washington University in St. Louis and author of “Confident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving Through Deep Difference.”
    Ryan T. Anderson, a Heritage Foundation scholar who is a leading advocate for religious conservatives, wrote that Trump’s order “does not address the major threats to religious liberty in the United States today.”
    Trump supporters argued that while the president’s order did not address all the concerns of religious conservatives, it was a first step.
    “This is a multistep process that will lead to accomplishing all our religious freedom objectives,” Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Council, said in a text message.
    President Trump holds the executive order aimed at easing an IRS rule limiting political activity for churches, on May 4, 2017, in the White House Rose Garden. (Photo: Evan Vucci/AP

    The biggest disappointment for religious conservatives was that Trump did nothing to assist them in ongoing conflicts with gay rights advocates that have played out, most conspicuously, over the rights of Christian bakers or photographers who do not want to provide services for same-sex weddings. The most pressing concern for most religious conservatives is what they see as growing hostility to their religious beliefs about sexuality and marriage.
    “Twice now, he has failed to stand up for common-sense policy on religious liberty when liberal opponents lashed out against it,” Anderson wrote.
    Anderson pointed to the leak in February of an earlier draft version of the executive order, which did include language that would have given religious conservatives protections in disputes with the LGBT community. LGBT groups denounced the language in that draft as bigotry.
    Anderson said that after the draft leaked, Trump “caved to the protests of liberal special interest groups.”
    And he said the language that was eventually signed by Trump in a Rose Garden ceremony at the White House on Thursday morning was “a mere shadow” of the leaked draft and is “woefully inadequate.”
    The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group, said in a statement that while “President Trump stated that the first priority of his administration would be to preserve and protect religious liberty,” the order issued Thursday “recalls those campaign promises but leaves them unfulfilled.”
    The ADF said that “no specific relief is offered” to people like Donald Vander Boon, a west Michigan meat plant owner whose business is under threat of closure by the U.S. Department of Agriculture because Vander Boon placed pamphlets explaining his conservative views on marriage in an employee break room.
    President Trump speaks about the executive order on religious liberty, accompanied by Cardinal Donald Wuerl, Pastor Jack Graham, Pastor and televangelist Paula White, and Vice President Mike Pence. (Photo: Evan 
    As for the complaints of religious groups who felt unduly burdened by the mandate in Obamacare to provide contraception in employer-sponsored health insurance plans, the Trump executive order merely directed federal agencies to “consider issuing amended regulations, consistent with applicable law, to address conscience-based objections to the preventive-care mandate.”
    That language also fell far short of what the religious right had hoped for.
    Trump’s executive order focused most specifically on weakening the so-called “Johnson Amendment,” which deals with the ability of pastors to speak about political matters and endorse political candidates from the pulpit or using church resources. Current law states that churches could lose tax-exempt status if the Internal Revenue Service finds that they are “directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.”
    Yet this issue is far from the minds of most religious conservatives.
    “In the universe of religious freedom issues facing our country today, the Johnson Amendment doesn’t come even close to the top,” Inazu said in an email. “As a practical matter, the Johnson Amendment has almost always been minimally enforced.”
    “My hunch is that one or two of Trump’s ‘religious advisers’ mentioned the Johnson Amendment early in the campaign. But how and why they focused on that issue is beyond me,” Inazu said.
    Even those who care about the Johnson amendment, such as the ADF, said that the problems presented by the law require legislation and that an executive order does little to fix it.
    Many conservatives suspected that Vice President Mike Pence, whom they see as an ally, was outmaneuvered by the president’s daughter, Ivanka, and her husband, Jared Kushner, who are influential advisers with top White House jobs. The two are widely believed to be sympathetic to the cause of gay rights.

    President Trump prepares to sign the executive order on religious liberty during the National Day of Prayer event in Washington. (Photo: Carlos Barria/Reuters)

    As governor of Indiana, Pence championed a broad religious liberty bill but watered it down after widespread criticism, angering his conservative allies. Now that he’s in the White House, he was expected to fight hard for a strong executive order as a way of making amends to that wing of the party.
    Last week, a Republican Senate aide told me the word about the religious liberty order on Capitol Hill was that “President Jared has it on hold.” The aide added: “I haven’t seen any evidence that Pence has the pull to trump Jared.”
    White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders downplayed the role of Trump’s daughter and son-in-law in a briefing with reporters.
    “I’m not aware of any specific role they may have played,” Sanders said. “I think that they are supportive of the president’s decision on this. I don’t think its any secret this is something that he campaigned on for a very long time, and they joined him on the campaign trail every day, and so I think that they would be supportive in this process.”
    A White House official who spoke to Yahoo News about the crafting of the order on condition of not being named said that “the president believes religious organizations have been unfairly targeted, but the president wants to make sure the reverse doesn’t happen, so great care was taken to make sure this was tightly defined.”
    After eight years of an administration seen as unsympathetic to their concerns, religious conservatives were hoping for more than a symbolic victory. Even so, “this is just the first bite at the apple, not the last,” said Ralph Reed, chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, in a statement.
    But Robert George, a Princeton professor who is one of the most prominent voices in favor of traditional marriage and opposed to gay marriage, was unequivocal in his judgment of what had happened.
    “The religious liberty executive order is meaningless. No substantive protections for conscience. A betrayal. Ivanka and Jared won. We lost,” George tweeted.


    SOURCE: yahoo.com

    Look: Is Usain Bolt's Girlfriend Showing Us Better Than She Could Tell Us He Cheated? Or are people taking her moves on the 'gram too serious?

    by BET staff



    Usain Bolt's girlfriend seems to be responding to reports and photos of him cheating quicker than the world's fastest man could run the 100-meter dash.

    The Shade Room spotted Kasi Bennett liking an Instagram split shot of someone favorably comparing her to the 20-year-old Brazilian student that Bolt allegedly cheated on her with in Rio de Janeiro during the Olympic Games.

    TSR STAFF : Thembi M. @ThembiTV_ on Instagram & Twitter _____________________ Roommates, you know we stay in everybody's business, and we came across what may be a confirmation from #UsainBolt's girlfriend that he cheated.. _____________________ If you're late to the tea, intimate pictures of #Usain with a couple of different females went viral earlier today, and it is being alleged that he cheated on her while celebrating his birthday in Rio. _____________________ His girlfriend, or possible future ex girlfriend #Kasi's social media 'likes' aren't putting the allegations to rest either. _____________________ She liked an Instagram photo which was a side by side picture of her and one of the women who #Usain allegedly cheated with. The wording in the photo is "When your girl is Selfridges, and you cheat on her with Primark." _____________________ We were also up in her Twitter likes, and she liked a tweet from a fan that said, "@usainbolt you--Sip the rest of this tea at theshaderoom.com. (Link In bio)
    AUGUST 23, 2016

    The "likes" could indicate that Bennett is not only acknowledging the reports and photos that Bolt cheated, but that she might have already moved on. Either that or the gram is taking it a little too seriously.
    She also tweeted:
    With lots of shade 🌴🌴 😁
    https:// status/767485561875595264 

    But between the damaging photos of him in bed with a Brazilian student, footage of Bolt grinding with a woman in a Rio nightclub and partying hard with several ladies in London, it feels like Usain might have moved on as well.
    Either that or he's combining his 30th birthday, triple-triple of three straight Olympics with three gold medals won, and retirement into one huge celebration that keeps going and going.

    SOURCE: bet.com

    31 seconds of the healthcare vote that shows why people hate politics


    By Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large


    Democrats sing 'Goodbye' after vote 00:31

    (CNN)When House Republicans secured their 216th "yes" on the American Health Care Act Thursday, Democrats immediately began taunting their across-the-aisle rivals.
    The implication was obvious: Democrats believed many Republicans had just cost themselves their political careers by voting for an overhaul of Obamacare.
      And the DC political class wonders why people hate them.
      I understand that Democrats not only didn't like the way this bill was passed -- without any estimates on what it might cost or how many people might lose coverage as a result -- but also believed the policies contained in it would leave the country and its people considerably worse off.
      That is a worthy conversation to have. But, that's not what Democrats were doing. Instead, they were jeering and mocking their colleagues.
      Look. We have two parties in this country for a reason. Democrats and Republicans don't always disagree on the problems the country faces but do almost always disagree on how to solve them.
      Debating those differences is the stuff of democracy. Giving the public the chance, every two years, to render their judgment on who has more of the right in the argument is the backbone of our political system.
      Poll after poll suggests that one thing both sides broadly agree on is that they prefer bipartisan compromise to go-it-alone-ism. When House Democrats act like they did today -- or President Trump acts like he does almost every day -- we get further and further from even the possibility of finding common ground or even just talking to each other like human beings.
      It also convinces people not in Washington or not involved in politics that the people who are representing them in DC have no real idea what they care about or value.
      That's a very bad thing for the long-term health of our democracy.

                                   The 11 states most likely to be affected by pre-existing conditions all voted for Trump

      SOURCE: edition.cnn.com

      House Passes Measure to Repeal and Replace the Affordable Care Act


      Video The House on Thursday passed a new version of a health care bill to replace the Affordable Care Act after the first one failed to get enough Republican support in March. The bill still needs to pass the Senate before becoming law.
      STEPHEN CROWLEY/THE NEW YORK TIMES


      By THOMAS KAPLAN and ROBERT PEAR


      WASHINGTON — The House on Thursday narrowly approved legislation to repeal and replace major parts of the Affordable Care Act, as Republicans recovered from their earlier failures and moved a step closer to delivering on their promise to reshape American health care without mandated insurance coverage.
      The vote, 217 to 213, held on President Trump’s 105th day in office, is a significant step on what could be a long legislative road. Twenty Republicans bolted from their leadership to vote no. But the win keeps alive the party's dream of unwinding president Barack Obama’s signature domestic achievement.

      The House measure faces profound uncertainty in the Senate, where a handful of Republican senators immediately rejected it, signaling that they would start work on a new version of the bill virtually from scratch.

      “To the extent that the House solves problems, we might borrow ideas,” said Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, chairman of the Senate health committee. “We can go to conference with the House, or they can pass our bill.”

      Even before the vote, some Republican senators had expressed deep reservations about one of the most important provisions of the House bill, which would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.
      But a softening of the House bill, which could help it get through the Senate, would present new problems. For any repeal measure to become law, the House and the Senate would have to agree on the language, a formidable challenge.

      Interactive Feature | How Every Member Voted on the House Health Care Bill The House voted on Thursday on a revised health care bill that would repeal and replace major parts of the Affordable Care Act.


      Just before the House vote, the Senate gave final approval on Thursday to a $1.1 trillion spending bill that will finance the government through September, and unlike the health care legislation, the spending bill had broad bipartisan support.

      After weeks of negotiations and false starts, Mr. Trump and House Republicans were not about to dwell on the tough road ahead. Passage of the health care bill completed a remarkable act of political resuscitation, six weeks after House leaders failed to muster the votes to pass an earlier version of the measure, a blow to Mr. Trump and Speaker Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin.

      “Yes, premiums will be coming down; yes, deductibles will be coming down, but very importantly, it’s a great plan,” Mr. Trump boasted on Thursday at the kind of White House Rose Garden victory ceremony typically reserved for legislation that is being signed into law, not for a controversial bill that passed just one chamber.

      “We want to brag about the plan,” Mr. Trump said, after asking those assembled how he was doing in his debut as a politician. “Hey, I’m president!”
      Mr. Trump quickly turned his attention to pressuring the Senate to act, calling the majority leader, Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, to talk about the way forward for the health plan.

      Democrats, who voted unanimously against the bill, vowed to make Republicans pay a political price for pushing such unpopular legislation. As Republicans reached the threshold for passage, Democrats serenaded them with, “Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey, goodbye!”

      “I have never seen political suicide in my life like I’m seeing today,” Representative Louise M. Slaughter, Democrat of New York, said on the House floor before the vote.

      Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, warned moderate Republicans who supported the measure: “You have every provision of this bill tattooed on your forehead. You will glow in the dark on this one.”

      The House bill would eliminate tax penalties for people who go without health insurance. It would roll back state-by-state expansions of Medicaid, which covered millions of low-income Americans. And in place of government-subsidized insurance policies offered exclusively on the Affordable Care Act’s marketplaces, the bill would offer tax credits of $2,000 to $4,000 a year, depending on age.

      A family could receive up to $14,000 a year in credits. The credits would be reduced for individuals making over $75,000 a year and families making over $150,000.

      The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the first version of the bill would trim the federal budget deficit considerably but would also leave 24 million more Americans without health insurance after a decade. Average insurance premiums would be 15 percent to 20 percent higher in 2018 and 2019, but after that, they would be lower than projected under current law.

      Mr. Alexander of Tennessee, chairman of the Senate health committee, said Thursday that Republicans had been quietly working for several months on their own bill and would take the House measure under consideration for ideas and components.

      Senate Republicans will face some of the same dynamics that stymied the House for weeks. Moderate senators will demand significant concessions, which in turn could alienate three hard-liners: Senators Ted Cruz of Texas, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Mike Lee of Utah.

      Republican senators are certain to face pressure from governors worried about constituents on Medicaid losing their coverage. Republican leaders changed the House bill to woo hard-line conservatives, allowing state governments to roll back required coverage for essential services like maternity and emergency care. States could also seek waivers that would let insurers charge higher premiums for some people with pre-existing medical conditions.

      Interactive Feature | Will the American Health Care Act Affect You? Share Your Story. The Times would like to hear from Americans who will be affected by the new plan to repeal and replace major parts of the Affordable Care Act.

      “We cannot pull the rug out from under states like Nevada that expanded Medicaid, and we need assurances that people with pre-existing conditions will be protected,” said Senator Dean Heller, Republican of Nevada, who is up for re-election next year.

      Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Louisiana, said he wanted to ensure that the final repeal bill “fulfills President Trump’s promises to lower premiums, maintain coverage and protect those with pre-existing conditions.”

      Democrats are confident that some provisions of the House bill will be found to violate special budget rules that Republicans must follow in order to skirt a Senate filibuster.

      “This bill is going nowhere fast in the United States Senate,” the Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer of New York, said. He said his Republican colleagues “should refuse to follow their House colleagues over a cliff, reject repeal, and work with Democrats to improve our health care system in a bipartisan way.”

      Republicans have promised for seven years to repeal the Affordable Care Act, under which around 20 million Americans gained health coverage. But they had no consensus on how much of the law should be repealed and had great difficulty devising a comprehensive replacement. Their doubts were reinforced by constituents who said the health law had saved their lives.

      Doctors, hospitals and other health care providers joined patient advocacy groups like the American Cancer Society and AARP in opposing the repeal bill.

      But House Republicans said that insurance markets in many states were already melting down, and they pointed to Iowa, where the last major insurer under the Affordable Care Act has threatened to pull out.



      Video Nancy Pelosi, the House minority leader, and other Democrats condemned the passage of a bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.
      GABRIELLA DEMCZUK FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES

      There may be “nobody to write insurance for people that are in the Obamacare exchanges” in 94 of Iowa’s 99 counties, said the House Republican whip, Steve Scalise of Louisiana.

      The House vote on Thursday occurred before the Congressional Budget Office had released a new analysis of the revised bill with its cost and impact. Democrats angrily questioned how Republicans could vote on a bill that would affect millions of people and a large slice of the American economy without knowing the ramifications.

      The Republican bill, the American Health Care Act, would make profound changes to Medicaid, the health program for low-income people, ending its status as an open-ended entitlement. States would receive an allotment of federal money for each beneficiary, or, as an alternative, they could take the money in a lump sum as a block grant, with fewer federal requirements. The bill would also repeal taxes imposed by the Affordable Care Act on high-income people, insurers and drug companies, among others. And it would cut off federal funds from Planned Parenthood for one year.

      Many defenders of the bill focused less on its details than on what they saw as shortcomings of the Affordable Care Act.

      “Obamacare has hijacked the free market and has taken some Americans’ liberties with it,” Representative Doug Collins, Republican of Georgia, said on the floor, adding that the health law “replaced our doctors with bureaucrats, because that’s what socialized medicine does.”

      Democrats worked to link House Republicans’ actions to an unpopular president. “The Pied Piper of Trump Tower is playing a tune today, and they must dance,” said Representative Lloyd Doggett, Democrat of Texas.

      Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts, told Republicans: “You are taking away essential health care protections. You are allowing insurance companies to discriminate against people with pre-existing conditions.”

      In truth, Republicans argued, with so many problems afflicting the Affordable Care Act, the status quo is unsustainable, regardless of what Congress does. Hours before the vote, Mr. Trump pointed to Aetna’s announcement this week that it would no longer offer policies on Virginia’s Affordable Care Act exchange.

      “Death spiral!” the president wrote on Twitter.




      SOURCE: mobile.nytimes.com

      US report: Building in Mosul airstrike contained explosives

      By  Barbara Starr , CNN Pentagon Correspondent                      Cmdr: Fair chance US airstrike hit civilians   01:57 (CNN) The ...